All contributions submitted to the journal and selected for peer review are evaluated by at least one, and typically two or more, independent reviewers chosen by the editors. The journal follows a Double-Blind Review process, in which both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous. This ensures impartiality by preventing any bias related to the author’s nationality, institutional affiliation, or prior controversial work. It also guarantees that manuscripts from well-known authors are judged solely on the quality and substance of their content, rather than on reputation.

The journal is dedicated to delivering an efficient service to both authors and readers. By combining the double-blind peer review system with an editorial board of independent experts, the publication process is designed to ensure rapid, unbiased, and well-founded decisions. The complete peer review and editorial workflow is illustrated in the following flowchart: